Why One Day Internationals Suddenly Seem Obsolete?

It’s the season of Twenty-Twenty or 20/20 cricket as we call it. First, we see the ICC allotting a slot (unofficially) for IPL and then they arrange for a T20 World Cup just after a gap of 2 years after the first edition in 2007. Cricketers, past and present, are writing their obituaries to the One Day Internationals (Games consisting of 50 overs per innings). Has T20 cricket killed One Day Internationals (ODIs) or is it just a temporary phase, a honeymoon, where T20s dominate for a while. Well, only time will tell. But, first, let us analyze why the ODIs have lost their importance over their years.

Pitches inclined in the favour of batsmen: If we analyze the history of ODIs, we will see that they were most popular during the period 1987-1999. Prior to 1995, totals of 300s were considered Himalayan. If a team posted a score of 250+, then the match was inclined to be in their favour, totals of 280 were sometimes deemed unchaseable. It was due to the presence of pitches that were either bowler-friendly or sportive. Batsmen had to earn their runs. But today, Batsmen have their say, rules and pitches are in their favor. Bigger and stronger bats with shorter boundaries help their cause in scoring pretty easy runs while the bowler is reduced to the role of a mute spectator. Today, even 300 is considered an easy target, 280 is below par and 220-250s are considered very easily chaseable. But in the golden 80’s and 90’s, even a target of 180 to 220 was defendable. The best examples being the 1996 Titan Cup where India easily defended a target of 223 against South Africa.

The presence of the truly great bowlers: In today’s cricketing world, if we desire to list out some great bowlers, the only names that come to mind are the Brett Lee, Shane Bond, Muralitharan, Mendis, Malinga and a few other names. The rest are either inconsistent and don’t shine in all kinds of pitches. But when you look at the 1990s, we had bowlers who dominated batsmen even in the most docile pitches: Wasim Akram and Waqar; Musthaq Ahmed and Saqlain; Murali; Donald, Fanie De Villers, and Pollock; Glenn Mcgrath and Gillespie; Srinath and Kumble; Eddo Brandes; Ambrose, Bishop, and Walsh.
Most of these bowlers have won matches when their sides were glaring at defeat. Ambrose and Walsh have triggered many collapses only to see their batting unit fail. Donald and Fanie de villiers have won many ODIs for their team. Murali and Jayasuriya spun India to defeat in the 1996 World Cup Semi-Finals. Saqlain and Mushtaq Ahmed have spun Pakistan to innumerable victories. Let’s not forget the frightening Waqar and the ever-reliable Wasim Akram, who demolished sides with their reverse-swinging Yorkers. No wonder the batsmen of today score easy runs. Even today’s greats like Hayden and Ponting never scored much against an ageing Wasim Akram. It speaks of the quality of bowling in the late 90s. Today’s bowlers are just able to contain the batsmen.

Great batsmen are identified by the quality of bowlers they play. Sachin and Lara were great because they played their audacious and stylish strokes even against the world’s greatest bowlers. Who can forget Lara’s 169 against Pakistan at Sharjah, or Sachin’s twin 100’s (142 and 134) against Australia in 1998. We also saw Jayasuriya plundering bowlers. His 48 ball hundred against Pakistan still stands as one of the most destructive innings ever seen. We saw Ajay Jadeja hammer Waqar Younis for 42 runs in 2 overs during the Quarter Finals of the 1996 World Cup. We saw Lance Klusuner murdering the Australian bowlers only to see Donald getting run-out at the penultimate ball.
1) The last and most important reason is that there are too much of one dayers played these days. A healthy cricket calendar should offer only limited and quality ODIs to the viewers. Today’s cricket calendars are crunched with innumerable, meaningless, ODIs, where sides play more for the sake of numbers. Batsmen and Bowlers get tired easily and as a result, players curtail their careers due to injuries.

If the ICC does not take measures to prepare sportive tracks and reduce the number of ODIs per year, we can say bye bye to ODIs. Hope sense prevails.

How India can defeat England?

Today, June 14th, 2009, India will play a crucial, must-win match against England. India must win this match and the next one against South Africa in order to qualify for the semis. England also need to win this match in order to increase their chances of a berth in the semis. Considering this, this match is of astronomical importance for both teams.

If England Bat First: England have had many problems with their batting order. Their key batsman Kevin Pietersen is injured, while the other batsmen such as Ravi Bopara, Owais Shah, and Collingwood are yet to post big scores against key opponents. Their bowling has been just a shade better than average. If India can get the wickets of Owais Shah, Ravi Bopara, and Pietersen early, then they have a strong chance of pulling off a big win. Indian bowlers have to bowl their hearts out against the Englishmen. The spinners will play a key role. Dhoni needs to use Harbhajan, Ojha, along with part-timers like Yuvraj and Raina effectively.
India must restrict England to a total of 140-150 runs at any cost. India should then try to reach the target within 17-18 overs in order to boost their Net Run Rate.

If India Bat First: India have a fine batting unit. It is upto Dhoni to utilize his batsmen properly. India need to score well during the powerplay. Gambhir should play the role of a sheet anchor and rotate the strike. Rohit, Yusuf, Yuvraj, and Raina need to score the runs for India. They have no other option but to score atleast 9+ runs an over as 170 is the par score in England. Dhoni has to drop himself down at no 6 or 7 and play his natural attacking game. Even if India loose early wickets, they have to keep attacking. Remember, no side has won a game by playing defensively and posting scores of 140-150. India need at least a total of 170-180 to win. It’s a literal Do-or-Die for Indian batsmen. They need to fire on all cylinders against England.

Indian bowlers need to get their line and length right. They need to go for wickets and not just containment. If India need to win convincingly, they need to get the wickets of Ravi Bopara, Owais Shah, Luke Wright, and Kevin Pietersen early. The spinners will play a key-role. The onus would be on Harbhajan and Ojha to deliver. The seamers Zaheer and Ishant need to get early wickets.

Dhoni and India must stop worrying and start planning

In the 2009 T20 Cricket World Cup, the defending champions India have put themselves in a spot of bother. They now need to win both their remaining matches in the Super Eights round against England and South Africa in order to keep their hopes alive. They could have easily averted this Do-or-Die situation if they had just PLANNED properly. Their captain, Dhoni, now-a-days seems to have an identity crisis. First, he gets the batting order horribly wrong, and then sends himself higher up the order, plays 23 balls and scores just 11 runs. Maybe he never realized that in the World of Twenty Twenty Cricket, even a strike-rate of 100-110 is just considered as average. Pardon me for saying this DHONI, T20 does not allow the slow pokes to survive. It’s time Dhoni switches back to his old style of hitting and stop pretending to play the sheet anchor role. In England, the par score is 170, so if India do bat first, they should have scored atleast 170-185 against WI, they failed to do and they lost. What Dhoni needs to do now is to learn from his past mistakes and mend them.

What Dhoni needs to do?
In order to win the remaining matches and then win the World cup, Dhoni has to first plan. You cannot enter a T20 match without a strategy. By seeing India’s recent performances, I can clearly say that India have never planned a clear strategy. Dhoni should stop relying heavily on his INSTINCTS and LUCK. India have a powerful batting order. All Dhoni needs to do is to allow the in-form batsmen such as Rohit, Raina, and Yusuf to have a go at the bowlers. Gambhir should be asked to play the Sheet anchor role and score at atleast a run-a-ball. Dhoni should drop himself to no 5 or 6. If India do lose early wickets, it makes no sense to play defensively. The logic is simple. You either go slam bang and make 160-170 allout rather than end up at 145-150. If India desire to win, their best batsmen need to face the majority of the overs, not an out of form DHONI.

The next thing Dhoni needs to address is the pathetic performance of his bowlers during the slog overs. It’s a pity that even inspite of having World Class Bowlers, we still manage to leak atleast 10-12 runs per over in the slog overs. India must tighten their bowling or just pack their bags and prepare to leave. The seniors Harbhajan and Zaheer need to take up the responsibility of taking crucial wickets and containing the opponents.

India must have a strategy for every individual opponent. They must ensure that they adapt themselves to counter the opponent’s strengths and exploit their weaknesses perfectly. For instance, England and South Africa are not very good players of spin bowling. So in this case, India should use their full time and part time spinners effectively and try to contain their opponents to a score of 150-160. While batting against their opponents, Indians must try to prevent the main bowlers in the opposition from taking wickets. If India can plan an effective strategy and execute it, then we are sure to be T20 World Cup champions again. As of now, let us keep our fingers crossed and pray that Dhoni and his team play sensible cricket and win.

T20 World Cup: A Look at the Contenders for the TITLE

It’s been 5 days since the T20 World Cup started and we have already seen a few upsets. Netherlands beat England a few days before. West Indies thrashed Australia and then Sri Lanka sent the Aussies out of the tournament by beating them very convincingly. Pakistan barely managed to scratch into the super eights thanks to their 81 run over Netherlands today. As of now, I see five major teams vying for the trophy. Let’s have a look at each of the prospective winners.


South Africa: They have been the chokers for long. For many tournaments, the South Africans have blasted their ways to the finals only to falter when it mattered the most. Their strength lies in their dangerous batting order, which boasts of names such as Gibbs, AB De Villiers, Albie Morkel, and Smith. Jacque Kallis and Duminy can play the role of an accumulator very well. Their bowling also seems to be potent with Dale Steyn, Ntini, and Morkel. Their major weakness is their tendency to falter in most important matches.

New Zealand: I bet my money on the Kiwis to win the 2009 T20 World cup. This team consists of quality hitters like Brendon Mccullum, Ross Taylor, Oram, and Jesse Ryder. Their slow bowlers, especially Oram and Styris, are going to be difficult to score off. Considering their ability to notch up big totals, I consider them favorites to win the T20 World cup. However, their bowlers are shown to be vulnerable to quality batsman. Moreover, if they use Mccullum or Ross Taylor early, they easily lose hopes of scoring/chasing a big total.

Sri Lanka: They are strong contenders for the title. They possess quality batsman such as Sanath Jayasuriya, Dilshan, Jayawardane, and Sangakkara and a lethal bowling attack in the form of Malinga, Mendis, and Murali. Considering the slow nature of England pitches, they are gonna be a handful to handle. However, the batting form of Jayasuriya seems to be a big worry. If the opponents do manage to hit Mendis or Murali, then Sri Lanka are going to find it hard to win matches.


India: The so-called favorites to win the World cup. Their chances have already taken a big blow due to Sehwag’s withdrawal due to injury. But they still posses some big hitters such as Gambhir, Rohit, Dhoni, Raina, Yuvraj, Yusuf, and Irfan. Their biggest drawback is that their batting order sometimes tends to collapse like a pack of cards. If India desire to win the World Cup, they need to click consistently as a unit. Dhoni needs to improve his captaincy. Of late, he has been relying more on his instincts rather than on his resources. If India needs to lift the cup, they need to thoroughly analyze their opponents and play accordingly. But due to their tendency to be inconsistent, I would not consider them to be hot favorites. Yuvraj and Raina need to prove their batting prowess in sporting pitches against the likes of Mendis and Murali.

West Indies: They have been the most mercurial team of all time. They have a potent batting order which has the firepower to blast any bowling attack. But unfortunately, the batting unit seldom clicks. They have always been guilty of throwing away a good start and end up losing matches which could have been won easily. Their greatest strength is their batting courtesy Gayle, Adrian, Bravo, Dwayne Smith, Chanderpaul, and Sarwan. Their biggest weakness is their inability to click as a team.


Pakistan: They have just scratched their way into the super eights. But they cannot be written off because Pakistan have always had the ability to bounce back from a pathetic start and win tournaments. The best example being the World cup victory in 1992. But in order to do that, they need to improve upon their batting and fielding. Their major problem has been a laid-back attitude which makes them lose matches miserably. Their biggest strength lies in their bowling courtesy Umar Gul, Afridi, and Ajmal. Their laidback attitude and lack of match practice may cost them dear.


England: They have a very slim chance to lift the World Cup. England, as we all know, have always been relying heavily upon 2-3 batsmen or bowlers to deliver the odds. This factor has always proved detrimental to the team. Moreover, Pietersen is carrying an injury and Flintoff is unlikely to play much of the games. Considering this factors, it would be a miracle even if they manage to make the semis. But as they say, Cricket is an unpredictable game, so never say NEVER.